Showing posts with label Idea-Hunting; the Idea-Hunter's dictionary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Idea-Hunting; the Idea-Hunter's dictionary. Show all posts

Monday, March 21, 2011

The Idea Hunter's Dictionary: D is for Diverse -- Insights from FMCG Practice


More and more different people? How desirable is that? Well, if getting new ideas is your objective, then we believe that it is essential!


There should no longer be any doubt in anyone's mind, as we move into this brave new world of Globalization, that diversity is much, much, more than mere political rhetoric. Make no mistake, "politically-correct" rhetoric was undoubtedly necessary to insure social change, and has been extremely important in forcing us to finally recognize the disservice that we've paid to our species by minimizing the potential contributions of an entire gender, and large groups of our fellow travelers on this planet, for much of recorded history. But, in many instances, we are now at a point where the institutionalization of diversity-preaching has faded into the background noise of running a complex organization. Despite this, we should not lose sight of the importance of diversity practices in building a smarter organization. Diversity -- be it gender, race, religion, geography, profession, you name it -- matters when new ideas are being sought!


From an Idea-Hunter's perspective, there is significant appreciation that diverse sources of ideas are our best chance for getting an "edge" on our competitors. In any industry, when we look around, the rivals have most likely gone to the same schools, studied the same materials, read the same books, hung-out with the same types of people, and probably, as a result of all of this, are likely to have the same ideas, at about the same point in time. Relying on diverse sources of experiences, insights, and ideas, to make an effort to break the "sameness cycle" and really get an unusual idea is the best antidote to being held hostage to the very same "conventional wisdom" as is everyone else. If we can strip-away the rhetorical baggage of preaching diversity, there is real merit in making the effort, as I discovered last week in a program that I ran for a global fast-moving-consumer-goods leader.


When I asked -- as an Idea-Hunter -- 30 or so mid-career participants to identify an actual example of how diversity worked to make their company more effective with respect to the acquisition and usage of new ideas, the results were gratifying and instructive:


* Behavior changes -- diverse teams create a motivation for team members to reappraise their behaviors, which typically results in increased professionalism and more effective interaction.

* More external partnerships -- diverse teams break the mold in what it possible, and what is familiar, and both lead to a greater range of partnership choices and a greater willingness to explore such relationships.

* Best-practice sharing -- diverse teams overcome "not-invented-here" tendencies by sharing experiences in an inclusive fashion: rather than imposing them from above -- change is fostered through peer-to-peer learning instead of being commanded. Also, by filling mid-career appointments from outside, it is possible to learn from other firms both inside and outside the industry.

* Diverse teams create the opportunity to debate such questions as "Why?" instead of starting immediately with "How?"

* Diverse teams lead to different levels of engagement -- the example of more women in the sales force was used by several teams to illustrate how the nature of the selling process was changed just by having different people [females] involved.


Each of these is a valuable outcome in its own right; together they represent a set of advantages that many organizations would love to have. What is so striking here, however, is that they are not so much "big, strategic" initiatives, but more the commonsense employment of diverse, and often temporary, teams which can be developed specifically for raising the probability of getting better ideas.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

The Idea Hunter's Dictionary: I is for Ideas


Ideas can move the world!


They come in all sorts of packages, from the [slightly dated, but still much loved] iPod nano shown here to the traditional book, which serves as a "container for ideas." And, ideas certainly move markets! Whether it’s the tablet computers that are such a rage, smart phones &/or their “apps”, or social-networking, compression software [mp3] replacing CD players, e-books nudging real books aside, extreme skiing, rap music, the "cloud," boutique hotels, reality television, our interest in nutrition (organic/bio becoming increasingly preferred in food selection): You name it, they’re all about ideas; new ideas displacing old ideas. Someone gets a new idea, it catches-on, and the world is changed. Not as easy, of course, as that makes it sound; but, in truth, that’s the way it works.

For many societies, the search for good ideas has taken on a sense of urgency as standards of living have become so grand that they can no longer compete in making things, because the cost of their labor is too high. As result, once making things is out, “knowing things” becomes the next possible advantage to pursue, and that means finding and harvesting new ideas! Money is spent on R&D; new universities are established; celebrated thinkers get appointed to government panels; but, it’s all very improvised; and there are few lessons to learn, much less anyone trying to learn them.

What do we really know about where good ideas are? How to find them? What to do with them once we get them? Not much, it turns out! In fact, one of the most amazing things that I’ve learned over a career in executive education is that while no one will ever deny the importance of good ideas as a competitive advantage at both the corporate and individual levels, and while we all agree that we are plunging headfirst, and at warp speed, into a “knowledge-intensive” era, what that really means to me, to us, is something that tends to get lost in our excitement for this next new thing.

It’s not that we’re not interested; but I suspect that the questions are too intimate; too revealing; to be pursued with any sort of vigor. In fact, possibly we’ve never even thought about it at all!

Maybe now is the time to begin?